We are: America's Second Harvest.
Learn About Hunger
Print page

Section 8.1.1

8.1.1 - Health Status

Clients were asked to indicate their health status, then to indicate whether anyone (or anyone else) in their household was in poor health. Table 8.1.1 summarizes the results.

Table 8.1.1
HEALTH STATUS
  Adult Clients Who Pick Up Food at a Pantry Adult Clients at a Kitchen Adult Clients at a Shelter Adult Clients at All Program Sites
Clients who indicated that their health was        
Excellent 11.0% 12.8% 20.2% 11.7%
Very good 15.3% 17.4% 28.2% 16.2%
Good 26.7% 29.9% 25.5% 27.1%
Fair 29.6% 27.4% 17.8% 28.7%
Poor 17.3% 12.5% 8.3% 16.2%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100%
         
Clients who indicated that someone else in the household was in poor health        
Yes 20.4% 11.4% 3.0% 18.4%
No 57.8% 49.0% 46.5% 56.2%
Live alone 21.7% 39.6% 50.5% 25.4%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100%
         
Households with at least one member reported to be in poor health 31.6% 21.1% 10.8% 29.2%
SAMPLE SIZE (N) 24,436 5,441 2,882 32,759

Overall, 16.2% of the clients at all program sites are in poor health, and 29.2% of the client households have one or more members in poor health. More details follow:

  • Among pantry clients, 11.0% were in excellent health, 15.3% in very good health, 26.7% in good health, and 47.0% in fair or poor health.
  • Among kitchen clients, 12.8% were in excellent health, 17.4% in very good health, 29.9% in good health, and 39.9% in fair or poor health.
  • Among shelter clients, 20.2% were in excellent health, 28.2% in very good health, 25.5% in good health, and 26.1% in fair or poor health.
  • 31.6% of the pantry client households had at least one person in poor health.
  • 21.1% of the kitchen client households had at least one person in poor health.
  • 10.8% of the shelter client households had at least one person in poor health.

Source
This table was constructed based on usable responses to Questions 20 and 21 of the client survey.

Notes
The percentages presented in this table are based only on usable responses, excluding missing, don't know, and refusal responses. All usable responses were weighted as described in Chapter 3 and in the Technical Appendix volume to represent all emergency food clients of the A2H network. The sample sizes (N) also include missing data.

For client health, missing, don't know, and refusal responses combined are 0.9% for pantry clients, 0.5% for kitchen clients, 0.1% for shelter clients, and 0.8% for all clients.

For poor health of anyone in household, missing, don't know, and refusal responses combined are 2.3% for pantry clients, 3.8% for kitchen clients, 8.4% for shelter clients, and 2.8% for all clients.